Methods of treating neurodegenerative disorders in a particular population

ABSTRACT

Disclosed herein are methods for treating, ameliorating, and/or preventing Alzheimer&#39;s Disease in a specific patient population using tramiprosate, valyl-3-amino-1-propanesulfonic acid, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof based upon a combination of APOE4 status and disease severity.

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No.62/216,404, filed Sep. 10, 2015, U.S. Provisional Application No.62/290,287, filed Feb. 2, 2016, U.S. Provisional Application No.62/302,027, filed Mar. 1, 2016, and U.S. Provisional Application No.62/365,809, filed Jul. 22, 2016, the disclosure of each of which arehereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present disclosure is generally related to treatment of neurologicaldisorders, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), and particularly AD in aspecific patient population.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

AD is a progressive degenerative disease of the brain primarilyassociated with aging. Prevalence of AD in the United States in 2000 wasclose to 4.5 million. It was estimated that about one in ten individualsover 65 and nearly half of those over 85 are affected by AD.Approximately 360,000 patients will be diagnosed with AD each year inthe United States alone.

Clinical presentation of AD is characterized by loss of memory,cognition, reasoning, judgment, and orientation. As the diseaseprogresses, motor, sensory, and linguistic abilities are also affecteduntil there is global impairment of multiple cognitive functions. Thesecognitive losses occur gradually and progressively, and typically leadto severe impairment and eventual death within twelve years ofdiagnosis.

AD is characterized by two major pathologic observations in the brain:neurofibrillary tangles and beta amyloid (or neuritic) plaques comprisedpredominantly of an aggregate of a peptide fragment known as betaamyloid peptide (Aβ). Individuals with AD exhibit characteristic Aβdeposits in the brain (Aβ plaques) and in cerebral blood vessels (betaamyloid angiopathy) as well as neurofibrillary tangles. Neurofibrillarytangles occur not only in AD but also in other dementia-inducingdisorders.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present disclosure is based, inter alia, on the discovery thathomotaurine (3-amino-1-propanesulfonic acid (3-APS), tramiprosate, orAlzhemed™) and its valine prodrug form, ALZ-801, have strongertherapeutic effects on specific subsets of human patients. In particularthese drugs show more efficacy in patients that are heterozygous for theApolipoprotein E4 (APOE4) gene and have moderate AD; as well as inpatients that are homozygous for the APOE4 gene and have mild-moderateor mild AD.

ALZ-801 (valyl-3-amino-1-propanesulfonic acid) is a novel, orallybioavailable, small-molecule prodrug of tramiprosate with improvedpharmacokinetics and oral tolerability over tramiprosate, shown below:

To our knowledge, nothing in the art has provided any reason to predictthat an APOE4-positive patient can respond to tramiprosate or a prodrugthereof (e.g., ALZ-801) differently depending on the severity of AD. Theseverity of AD can be measured through the use of the Mini-mental StateExamination (MMSE). As used herein, “baseline MMSE” refers to a MMSEscore obtained within 60 days, preferably within 30 days, prior toinitial treatment. A baseline MMSE score of 20-26 is considered to bemild AD; while a baseline MMSE score of 16-19 is considered to bemoderate AD. In the present application, we subdivide moderate AD into“mild-moderate AD” defined as a baseline MMSE score of 18-19 and “moremoderate AD” defined as a baseline MMSE score of 16-17. We alsosubdivide mild AD into “less mild AD” defined as a baseline MMSE scoreof 20-21 and “more mild AD” defined as a baseline MMSE score of 22-26.

Applicants have surprisingly discovered based on clinical data, thatAPOE4-heterozygous patients suffering from moderate AD respondunexpectedly better to treatment with tramiprosate or a prodrug thereof(e.g., ALZ-801) than the other AD patients (e.g., APOE4negative/moderate AD; APOE4 heterozygous with mild AD). Accordingly, thepresent disclosure provides a novel method of treating AD in anAPOE4-heterozygous patient that has moderate AD.

In addition, Applicants have surprisingly discovered based on clinicaldata, that APOE4/4 homozygous patients suffering from mild AD ormild-moderate AD respond unexpectedly better to treatment withtramiprosate or a prodrug thereof (e.g., ALZ-801) than the other ADpatients (e.g., APOE4/4 homozygous patients with more moderate AD). Inparticular, APOE4/4 homozygous patients with mild AD (baseline MMSEscore of 20-26) and mild-moderate AD (baseline MMSE score of 18-19) tendto show a higher improvement on tramiprosate at 150 mg BID than thosewith MMSE<18 at baseline. Additionally, ApoE4/4 homozygous patients withbaseline MMSE≥22 showed the highest efficacy and a progressive increasein cognitive benefit compared to placebo over the 78 weeks of the study.The same is expected for the equivalent dose (265 mg BID) of ALZ-801—atramiprosate prodrug.

Accordingly, some aspects of the present disclosure relate to a methodof treating AD in a subject, the method comprising the following steps:(i) determining the APOE4 status of the subject; (ii) determining theseverity of AD in the subject; and (iii) administering, to the subject,a pharmaceutical composition capable of delivering tramiprosate to therecipient (e.g., a composition comprising tramiprosate or a prodrugthereof (e.g., ALZ-801 or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof))when the subject is determined to be APOE4 heterozygous and havemoderate AD; or when the subject is determined to be APOE4/4 homozygousand have mild or mild-moderate AD.

In some embodiments, the disclosure provides a method of treatingAlzheimer's Disease in a subject, the method comprising administering apharmaceutical composition comprising valyl-3-amino-1-propanesulfonicacid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof to a subjectdetermined to (i) be APOE4 heterozygous and have moderate Alzheimer'sDisease; or (ii) be APOE4/4 homozygous and have mild or mild-moderateAlzheimer's disease.

In a related embodiment, the disclosure provides a method of treatingAlzheimer's Disease in a subject, the method comprising the steps of:

a. administering a pharmaceutical composition comprising tramiprosate,valyl-3-amino-1-propanesulfonic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptablesalt of either of the foregoing to a subject determined to (i) be APOE4heterozygous and have moderate Alzheimer's Disease; or (ii) be APOE4/4homozygous and have mild or mild-moderate Alzheimer's disease; andb. not administering, to the subject, the pharmaceutical compositionwhen the subject is determined to be (i) APOE4 negative; (ii) APOE4heterozygous and not suffering from moderate Alzheimer's Disease; or(iii) APOE4/4 homozygous and not suffering from mild or mild-moderateAlzheimer's disease. In one aspect of these embodiments, when thesubject is determined to be (i) APOE4 negative; (ii) APOE4 heterozygousand not suffering from moderate Alzheimer's Disease; or (iii) APOE4/4homozygous and not suffering from mild or mild-moderate Alzheimer'sdisease, that subject is administered a therapeutic other thantramiprosate, valyl-3-amino-1-propanesulfonic acid or a pharmaceuticallyacceptable salt of either of the foregoing.

In related embodiments, the disclosure provides a method of treating ADin a subject, comprising: (i) determining the APOE4 status of thesubject; (ii) determining the baseline MMSE score of the subject; and(iii) administering, to the subject, a pharmaceutical compositioncapable of delivering tramiprosate to the recipient (e.g., a compositioncomprising tramiprosate or a prodrug thereof (e.g., ALZ-801 or apharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof)) when the subject isdetermined to be APOE4 heterozygous and have a baseline MMSE score of16-19; or when the subject is determined to be APOE4/4 homozygous andhave a baseline MMSE score of 18-26.

The term “APOE4” status as used herein means determining the number ofAPOE4 alleles in the subject (e.g., 0, 1 or heterozygous, and 2 orAPOE4/4 homozygous).

In some embodiments, when the subject is determined to be APOE4negative, APOE4 heterozygous with mild AD (i.e., baseline MMSE score of20-26, or APOE4/4 homozygous with more moderate or severe AD (i.e.,baseline MMSE score of <18), the pharmaceutical composition capable ofdelivering tramiprosate is not administered to the subject and,optionally, the patient is treated with a different therapeutic.

In yet other related embodiments, the disclosure provides a method oftreating AD in a subject, comprising: (i) receiving information aboutthe APOE4 status and AD disease severity of the subject; and (ii)administering to the subject, a pharmaceutical composition capable ofdelivering tramiprosate to the recipient (e.g., a composition comprisingtramiprosate or a prodrug thereof (e.g., ALZ-801 or a pharmaceuticallyacceptable salt thereof)) when the subject is APOE4 heterozygous and hasa baseline MMSE score of 16-19; or when the subject is APOE4/4homozygous and has a baseline MMSE score of 18-26.

In still other related embodiments, the disclosure provides a method oftreating AD in a subject, comprising administering to the subject, apharmaceutical composition capable of delivering tramiprosate to therecipient (e.g., a composition comprising tramiprosate or a prodrugthereof (e.g., ALZ-801 or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof))wherein the subject is APOE4 heterozygous and has a baseline MMSE scoreof 16-19; or wherein the subject is APOE4/4 homozygous and has abaseline MMSE score of 18-26.

In yet another embodiment, the disclosure provides a method ofdetermining a subject's suitability for treatment withvalyl-3-amino-1-propanesulfonic acid, comprising determining the APOE4status of the subject and the determining the severity of the subject'sAlzheimer's disease, wherein if: a) the subject is APOE4 heterozygousand has moderate Alzheimer's disease; or b) the subject is APOE4/4homozygous and has mild or mild-moderate Alzheimer's disease, then thesubject is determined to be suitable for the treatment.

In a related embodiment, the disclosure provides a method of determininga subject's suitability for treatment with tramiprosate orvalyl-3-amino-1-propanesulfonic acid, or a pharmaceutically acceptablesalt of either of the foregoing, comprising determining the APOE4 statusof the subject and the determining the severity of the subject'sAlzheimer's disease, wherein if: a) the subject is APOE4 heterozygousand has moderate Alzheimer's disease; or b) the subject is APOE4/4homozygous and has mild or mild-moderate Alzheimer's disease, then thesubject is determined to be suitable for the treatment; and if (i) thesubject is APOE4 heterozygous and has mild Alzheimer's disease; (ii) thesubject is APOE4 negative; or (iii) the subject is APOE4/4 homozygousand has more moderate Alzheimer's disease, then the subject isdetermined to be unsuitable for the treatment

In certain aspects of the above embodiments, the subject is treated ordetermined to be suitable for treatment if they are APOE4/4 homozygousand have a baseline MMSE score of 18-26, 19-26, 20-26, 21-26, or 22-26.In more specific aspects of these embodiments, the subject is treated ordetermined to be suitable for treatment if they are APOE4/4 homozygousand have a baseline MMSE score of 20-26. In even more specific aspectsof these embodiments, the subject is treated or determined to besuitable for treatment if they are APOE4/4 homozygous and have abaseline MMSE score of 22-26.

In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is administered todeliver a dose of tramiprosate in a range of 100 mg to 300 mg per dose.In some aspects of these embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition isadministered to deliver a dose of tramiprosate in a range of 100 mg-150mg/dose. In more specific aspects of these embodiments, thepharmaceutical composition is administered to deliver 150 mg/dose. Insome aspects of these embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositioncomprises 300-350 mg of ALZ-801/dose. In more specific aspects of theseembodiments, the pharmaceutical composition comprises 265 mg ofALZ-801/dose.

In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is administered oncedaily or twice daily. In some aspects of these embodiments, thepharmaceutical composition is administered twice daily.

In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is administered tothe subject for a period of time, e.g. 13 weeks or more; 26 weeks ormore; 52 weeks or more; 65 weeks or more; or 78 weeks or more.

It should be understood that the methods of this invention areconsidered effective if the decline of cognitive abilities is slowed ascompared to a standard-of-care control treatment with ananticholinesterase inhibitor with or without memantine (e.g., donepezilalone or in combination with memantine). The treatment efficacy can bedetermined by metrics known in the art, e.g., the ADAS-Cog score orCDR-SB score. For the ADAS-Cog score or CDR-SB score, a higher scoreindicates lower cognition. In some embodiments, a subject diagnosed asAPOE4 heterozygous and having moderate AD has an ADAS-Cog score thatincreases at an average rate of no more than 0.13 per week when thesubject is being treated with the pharmaceutical composition over aperiod of between 52 and 78 weeks. In some embodiments, the subject'sADAS-Cog score increases by no more than 7 after administration for 52weeks, as compared to subject's baseline ADAS-Cog score. In someembodiments, the subject's CDR-SB score increases at an average rate ofno more than 0.05 per week when the subjected is being treated with thepharmaceutical composition over a period of between 52 and 78 weeks. Insome embodiments, the subject's CDR-SB score increases no more than 3.0after administration for 52 weeks, as compared to subject's baselineCDR-SB score.

In some embodiments, the subject is 85 years old or less, e.g., 65-85years old.

In some embodiments, the treatment does not induce vasogenic edema.

In some embodiments, the disclosure provides a pharmaceuticalcomposition comprising between 260 mg and 270 mg (e.g., 265 mg) ofvalyl-3-amino-1-propanesulfonic acid; and a pharmaceutically acceptablecarrier, wherein the composition is formulated as an instant release,oral tablet or capsule.

In some embodiments, the disclosure provides a method of treatingAlzheimer's disease comprising administering to a subject in needthereof, the instant release, oral, pharmaceutical compositioncomprising between 260 mg and 270 mg (e.g., 265 mg) ofvalyl-3-amino-1-propanesulfonic acid described above. In some aspects ofthese embodiments, the method comprised administering the compositiontwice a day.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FIGURES

FIG. 1 demonstrates time course of tramiprosate effect (Least Square(LS) Mean) on ADAS-Cog in APOE4 Heterozygous Population at 100 mg BIDand 150 mg BID (Population ≤Age 85 Years, mild to moderate AD).

FIG. 2 demonstrates time course of tramiprosate effect (LS Mean) onCDR-SB in APOE4 Heterozygous Population at 100 mg BID and 150 mg BID(Population ≤Age 85 Years, mild to moderate AD).

FIG. 3 demonstrates time course of tramiprosate effect (LS Mean) onADAS-Cog in APOE4⁺ Population at 100 mg BID and 150 mg BID (Population≤85 Years, mild to moderate AD).

FIG. 4 demonstrates time course of tramiprosate effect (LS Mean) onCDR-SB in APOE4⁺ Population at 100 mg BID and 150 mg BID (Population≤Age 85 Years, mild to moderate AD).

FIG. 5 demonstrates time course of tramiprosate effect (LS Mean) onADAS-Cog in APOE4⁺ Population at 100 mg BID and 150 mg BID (Population≤85 Years, moderate AD).

FIG. 6 demonstrates time course of tramiprosate effect (LS Mean) onCDR-SB in APOE4⁺ Population at 100 mg BID and 150 mg BID (Population ≤85Years, moderate AD).

FIG. 7, panel A, demonstrates the effect of tramiprosate 150 mg BID onADAS-Cog scores in APOE4/4 homozygous patients over 52, 65 and 78 weeks,broken down by various ranges of disease severity (as measured bybaseline MMSE scores) as compared to a placebo control. FIG. 7, panel B,demonstrates the effect of 150 mg BID tramiprosate on CDR-SB scores inAPOE4/4 homozygous patients over 52, 65 and 78 weeks, broken down byvarious ranges of disease severity (as measured by baseline MMSE scores)as compared to a placebo control.

FIG. 8 depicts the time course of plasma tramiprosate levels in humansorally administered 205 mg or 342 mg of ALZ-801 in an instant releaseformulation, as well as the predicted time course for a 256 mg dose ofALZ-801.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Definitions

The following definitions are used in connection with the disclosure.

The terms “subject” and “patient” are used interchangeably herein andrefer to a human diagnosed with Alzheimer's Disease.

As used herein, the term “APOE4 positive” or “APOE4⁺” refers to thepresence of at least one APOE4 allele in a subject, e.g., one or twoAPOE4 alleles. In some aspects, the subject may have a single APOE4allele, i.e., they are heterozygous for APOE4 and will be denoted as“APOE4 heterozygous” or as an “APOE4 heterozygote”. In other aspects,the subject may have 2 APOE4 alleles, i.e., they are homozygous forAPOE4 and will be denoted as “APOE4/4 homozygous” or as an “APOE4/4homozygote”.

As used herein, the term “APOE4 negative” refers to the absence of APOE4allele in a subject.

As used herein, the terms ‘placebo” and “control” are usedinterchangeably to refer to Aricept® alone (i.e. donepezil) or incombination with memantine.

As used herein, an “effective amount” when used in connection withanother therapeutic agent is an amount that is effective for treating orpreventing a condition in combination with a compound. “In combinationwith” includes administration within the same composition and viaseparate compositions; in the latter instance, the other therapeuticagent is effective for treating or preventing a condition during a timewhen the compound exerts its prophylactic or therapeutic effect, or viceversa.

As used herein, the term “pharmaceutically acceptable” refers to drugs,medicaments, inert ingredients etc., which the term describes, suitablefor use in contact with the tissues of humans and lower animals withoutundue toxicity, incompatibility, instability, irritation, allergicresponse, and the like, commensurate with a reasonable benefit/riskratio. It preferably refers to a compound or composition that isapproved or approvable by a regulatory agency of the Federal or stategovernment or listed in the U.S. Pharmacopoeia or other generallyrecognized pharmacopoeia for use in animals and more particularly inhumans.

As used herein, the term “pharmaceutical composition” refers to at leastone compound and at least one pharmaceutically acceptable vehicle, withwhich the compound is administered to a patient.

The term “carrier” refers to diluents or fillers, disintegrants,precipitation inhibitors, surfactants, glidants, binders, lubricants,anti-oxidants, and other excipients and vehicles with which the compoundis administered. Carriers are generally described herein and also in“Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences” by E. W. Martin. Examples ofcarriers include, but are not limited to, aluminum monostearate,aluminum stearate, carboxymethylcellulose, carboxymethylcellulosesodium, crospovidone, glyceryl isostearate, glyceryl monostearate,hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxymethyl cellulose,hydroxyoctacosanyl hydroxystearate, hydroxypropyl cellulose,hydroxypropyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, lactose, lactosemonohydrate, magnesium stearate, mannitol, microcrystalline cellulose,poloxamer 124, poloxamer 181, poloxamer 182, poloxamer 188, poloxamer237, poloxamer 407, povidone, silicon dioxide, colloidal silicondioxide, silicone, silicone adhesive 4102, and silicone emulsion. Itshould be understood, however, that the carriers selected for thepharmaceutical compositions provided in the present disclosure, and theamounts of such carriers in the composition, may vary depending on themethod of formulation (e.g., dry granulation formulation, soliddispersion formulation).

The term “diluent” or “filler” generally refers to a substance that isused to dilute the compound of interest prior to delivery. Diluents canalso serve to stabilize compounds. Examples of diluents may includestarch, saccharides, disaccharides, sucrose, lactose, polysaccharides,cellulose, cellulose ethers, hydroxypropyl cellulose, sugar alcohols,xylitol, sorbitol, maltitol, microcrystalline cellulose, calcium orsodium carbonate, lactose, lactose monohydrate, dicalcium phosphate,cellulose, compressible sugars, dibasic calcium phosphate dehydrate,mannitol, microcrystalline cellulose, and tribasic calcium phosphate.

The term “disintegrant” generally refers to a substance which, uponaddition to a solid preparation, facilitates its break-up ordisintegration after administration and permits the release of an activeingredient as efficiently as possible to allow for its rapiddissolution. Examples of disintegrants may include maize starch, sodiumstarch glycolate, croscarmellose sodium, crospovidone, microcrystallinecellulose, modified corn starch, sodium carboxymethyl starch, povidone,pregelatinized starch, and alginic acid.

The term “precipitation inhibitors” generally refers to a substance thatprevents or inhibits precipitation of the active agent. One example of aprecipitation inhibitor includes hydroxypropyl methylcellulose.

The term “surfactants” generally refers to compounds that lower thesurface tension between two liquids or between a liquid and a solid.Examples of surfactants include poloxamer and sodium lauryl sulfate.

The term “glidant” generally refers to substances used in tablet andcapsule formulations to improve flow-properties during tabletcompression and to produce an anti-caking effect. Examples of glidantsmay include colloidal silicon dioxide, talc, fumed silica, starch,starch derivatives, and bentonite.

The term “binder” generally refers to any pharmaceutically acceptablefilm which can be used to bind together the active and inert componentsof the carrier together to maintain cohesive and discrete portions.Examples of binders may include hydroxypropyl cellulose, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, povidone, copovidone, ethyl cellulose, gelatin, andpolyethylene glycol.

The term “lubricant” generally refers to a substance that is added to apowder blend to prevent the compacted powder mass from sticking to theequipment during the tableting or encapsulation process. A lubricant canaid the ejection of the tablet form the dies, and can improve powderflow. Examples of lubricants may include magnesium stearate, stearicacid, silica, fats, calcium stearate, polyethylene glycol, sodiumstearyl fumarate, or talc; and solubilizers such as fatty acidsincluding lauric acid, oleic acid, and C₈/C₁₀ fatty acid.

As used herein, the term “pharmaceutically acceptable salt,” as usedherein unless otherwise defined, is a salt of a basic group, such as anamino group, or of an acidic group, such as a carboxyl group, on thecompounds disclosed herein. Illustrative salts of a basic group include,but are not limited, to sulfate, citrate, acetate, oxalate, chloride,bromide, iodide, nitrate, bisulfate, phosphate, acid phosphate,isonicotinate, lactate, salicylate, acid citrate, tartrate, oleate,tannate, pantothenate, bitartrate, ascorbate, succinate, maleate,gentisinate, fumarate, gluconate, glucaronate, saccharate, formate,benzoate, glutamate, methanesulfonate, ethanesulfonate,benzenesulfonate, p-toluenesulfonate, camphorsulfonate, and pamoate(i.e., 1,1′-methylene-bis-(2-hydroxy-3-naphthoate)) salts. Illustrativesalts of an acidic group include, but are not limited, to lithium,sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, aluminum, chromium, iron, copper,zinc, cadmium, ammonium, guanidinium, pyridinium, and organic ammoniumsalts.

As used herein, the term “treating” or “treatment” of any disease ordisorder refers, in some embodiments, to ameliorating at least onedisease or disorder (i.e., arresting or reducing the development of thedisease or at least one of the clinical symptoms thereof). In certainembodiments “treating” or “treatment” refers to ameliorating at leastone physical parameter, which may or may not be discernible by thepatient. In certain embodiments, “treating” or “treatment” refers toinhibiting the disease or disorder, either physically, (e.g.,stabilization of a discernible symptom), physiologically, (e.g.,stabilization of a physical parameter), or both. In certain embodiments,“treating” or “treatment” refers to delaying the onset of certainsymptoms of the disease or disorder. The term “treating” refers to anyindicia of success in the treatment or amelioration of an injury,pathology or condition, including any objective or subjective parametersuch as abatement; remission; diminishing of symptoms or making theinjury, pathology or condition more tolerable to the subject; slowing inthe rate of degeneration or decline; making the final point ofdegeneration less debilitating; improving a subject's physical or mentalwell-being; or, in some situations, preventing the onset of dementia.The treatment or amelioration of symptoms can be based on objective orsubjective parameters; including the results of a physical examination,a psychiatric evaluation, or a cognition test such as the ClinicalDementia Rating (CDR) scale, Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE),Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD), Alzheimer's Disease AssessmentScale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog), or another test known in the art.For example, the methods of the invention successfully treat a subject'sdementia by slowing the rate of or lessening the extent of cognitivedecline.

As used herein, the term “bioequivalence” refers to equivalence of therate and extent of absorption of a drug after administration of equaldoses of the drug or prodrug to a patient.

As used herein, the term “statistically significant” refers to meansthat an observation or an event is not attributed to random chance,p=0.05 or less.

The term “baseline score” and forms thereof, such as “baseline MMSE”,“baseline ADAS-Cog score” and “baseline CDR-SB score,” as used hereinrefer to a subject's score in a particular test obtained 0-60 days,preferably 0-30 days, prior the treatment for which efficacy is to bedetermined (or prior to treatment with a corresponding placebo orcontrol).

As used herein, “mildly severe AD” and “mild AD” are usedinterchangeably and refer to a baseline MMSE score of 20-26; “lessmildly severe AD” and “less mild AD” are used interchangeably and referto a baseline MMSE score of 20-21; and “more mildly severe AD” and “moremild AD” are used interchangeably and refer to a baseline MMSE score of22-26.

As used herein, “moderately severe AD” and “moderate AD” are usedinterchangeably and refer to a baseline MMSE score of 16-19;“mild-moderately severe AD” and “mild moderate AD” are usedinterchangeably and refer to a baseline MMSE score of 18-19; and “moremoderately severe AD” and “more moderate AD” are used interchangeablyand refer to a baseline MMSE score of 16-17.

The term “about” when used in connection with a referenced numericindication means the referenced numeric indication plus or minus up to10% of that referenced numeric indication. For example, the language“about 100” covers the range of 90 to 110.

Methods for Treating AD

Individuals presently suffering from AD can be recognized fromcharacteristic dementia, as well as the presence of risk factorsdescribed below. In addition, a number of diagnostic tests based oncognitive and neurological testing are available for identifyingindividuals who have AD. For example, individuals suffering from AD canbe diagnosed by the CDR scale, MMSE, ADAS-Cog, or any other test knownin the art, as discussed herein. Baseline scores on suitable metricsincluding the MMSE and the ADAS together with other metrics designed toevaluate a more normal population can be used to find an at-riskpopulation. Higher values for ADAS-Cog, CDR-SB and NPI indicate greaterseverity, while lower values in DAD and MMSE indicate greater severity.

Another method for identifying an at-risk group utilizes an assay forneural thread protein in the urine; see, e.g., Munzar et al., Neurologyand Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 2002, No. 1. Patients with high riskfor AD can also be selected from a population by screening for earlysigns of memory loss or other difficulties associated withpre-Alzheimer's symptomatology, a family history of AD, patients withMild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), genetic risk factors, age, sex, andother features found to predict high-risk for AD. In addition, AD can bediagnosed through imaging techniques, e.g., the use of β-amyloid imagingagents (e.g., florbetaben, florbetapir or flutemetamol).

The APOE4 (i.e., APOE ε4) allele of apolipoprotein E gene is thestrongest genetic risk factor for patients with late-onset AD. APOE4⁺subjects with at least one APOE ε4 allele account for 50%-60% of ADcases vs. 25% prevalence in healthy individuals. APOE4⁺ AD patientspresent with decreased age of onset, increased severity and acceleratedprogression of AD. Subjects with two APOE ε4 alleles account for 10%-14%of AD and exhibit an even more aggressive disease progression. APOE ε4allele leads to an increased brain Aβ deposition, increased CSF tau andp-tau, and faster cognitive decline. In addition, demented patientscarrying one or two APOE ε4 alleles are more likely to have AD,resulting in significantly reduced rate of disease misdiagnosis inclinical studies (2% vs. 42% in non-APOE4 patients).

Methods of identifying APOE4-postive patients are known in the art andcan be performed by any approach capable of determining that a patientas having one or two copies of the ε4 allele. In some embodiments,sequencing technology is used to determine the presence and/or number ofAPOE4 alleles. Methods of determining the severity of AD can be based onthe CDR scale, MMSE, ADAS-Cog, or any other test known in the art.

Analysis of data from clinical studies based on tramiprosate revealed aspecific responsive patient population: subjects with moderate AD whoare APOE4 positive. For example, as shown in Tables 1 and 2, in allAPOE4⁺ patients (i.e., including both homozygotes and heterozygotes)under 85 years old, the patients with moderate AD are found to be moreresponsive to tramiprosate than the patients with mild AD, as indicatedby a larger positive delta value in the moderate group over the mildgroup. Similarly, as shown in Tables 3 and 4, in heterozygous APOE4⁺patients under 85 years old, the patients with moderate AD are found tobe more responsive to tramiprosate than the patients with mild AD. Thedelta value in all of these tables is calculated by measuring theincrease in score over baseline for each patient in a treatment groupand obtaining the mean increase for such group and then subtracting thatvalue from the mean increase in score over baseline for all patients inthe placebo group. Thus, a positive delta value in these tablesrepresents an improvement over the placebo group.

In some embodiments, the subject is determined to have moderate AD whenthe subject has a baseline MMSE score in the range of 16-19. In someembodiments, the subject is determined to have mild AD when the subjecthas a baseline MMSE score in the range of 20-26. Tramiprosate alsoshowed a favorable safety profile: the most common adverse event wasnausea. Safety data from Phase 3 tramiprosate studies support bridgingto the ALZ-801 safety database, based on bioequivalence. The disclosuresin provisional application Ser. No. 62/216,404, filed Sep. 10, 2015,62/290,287, filed Feb. 2, 2016, and 62/365,809, filed Jul. 22, 2016 areincorporated herein for all purposes and particularly regarding dosagesand formulations.

Accordingly, in one aspect, the present disclosure relates to a methodof treating AD in a subject based on the determination of APOE4phenotype and AD severity in the subject. In some embodiments, theinvention provides a method that comprises the following steps: (i)determining the presence or absence of an APOE4 allele in the subject;(ii) determining the severity of AD in the subject; and (iii)administering, to the subject, a pharmaceutical composition comprisingALZ-801 or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof when the subjectis determined to be APOE4 positive and have moderate AD.

In certain aspects, when the subject is tested APOE4 negative, thepharmaceutical composition that delivers tramiprosate to the recipient(e.g. a composition comprising tramiprosate, ALZ-801 or apharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof) may not be administered to thesubject. In other aspects, when the severity of AD in the subject isdetermined to be not moderate, the pharmaceutical composition thatdelivers tramiprosate to the recipient may not be administered to thesubject. For example, when the subject has mild AD, the pharmaceuticalcomposition that delivers tramiprosate to the recipient may not beadministered to the subject.

In certain aspects, the pharmaceutical composition that deliverstramiprosate to the recipient comprises ALZ-801. In alternate aspects,the pharmaceutical composition that delivers tramiprosate to therecipient comprises tramiprosate.

In some embodiments, when the subject is tested APOE4 negative or theseverity of AD in the subject is not moderate (e.g., mild), a therapyother than tramiprosate, ALZ-801 or a pharmaceutically acceptable saltthereof or tramiprosate may be administered to the subject.

In one aspect, the present disclosure relates to a method of treatingAlzheimer's disease comprising the steps of: (i) receiving informationrelated to the presence or absence of an APOE4 allele in a human patientsuffering from Alzheimer's disease; (ii) receiving information relatedto the severity of the Alzheimer's disease in the human patient; and(iii) administering to the patient in need thereof tramiprosate, ALZ-801or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof when the informationindicates that the patient has at least one APOE4 allele and hasmoderate severity of Alzheimer's disease.

In yet another aspect, the present disclosure also relates to a methodof predicting a subject's responsiveness to tramiprosate, ALZ-801 or apharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, the method comprising: (i)determining the presence or absence of an APOE4 allele in the subject;(ii) determining the severity of AD in the subject; and (iii)identifying the subject as being responsive to tramiprosate, ALZ-801 ora pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof when the subject isdetermined to be APOE4 positive and have moderate AD.

In a further aspect, the present disclosure relates to a method ofpredicting the efficacy of tramiprosate, ALZ-801 or a pharmaceuticallyacceptable salt thereof in the treatment of a human patient sufferingfrom Alzheimer's disease comprising the steps of: (i) determining thepresence or absence of an APOE4 allele in the patient; and (ii)determining the severity of the patient's Alzheimer disease, wherein thepresence of at least one APOE4 allele and a determination that thepatient has moderately severe Alzheimer's disease is predictive of theefficacy of tramiprosate, ALZ-801 or a pharmaceutically acceptable saltthereof in the treatment.

The treatment efficacy of the pharmaceutical composition disclosedherein can be assessed using tests known in the art, such as ADAS-Cog,the CDR scale, MMSE, DAD, or combinations thereof.

In certain embodiments, the treatment efficacy may be determined throughthe ADAS-Cog scale. ADAS was designed to measure the severity of themost important symptoms of AD. Its subscale ADAS-Cog is the most popularcognitive testing instrument used in clinical trials of nootropics. Itconsists of 11 tasks measuring the disturbances of memory, language,praxis, attention and other cognitive abilities which are often referredto as the core symptoms of AD. The ADAS-Cog scale helps evaluatecognition and differentiates between normal cognitive functioning andimpaired cognitive functioning. It is especially useful for determiningthe extent of cognitive decline and can help evaluate which stage of ADa person is in, based on his answers and score. The ADAS-Cog scale canbe used in clinical trials in order to determine incrementalimprovements or declines in cognitive functioning.

In some embodiments, the treatment is considered to be effective whenthe subject's ADAS-Cog score increases at an average rate of no morethan 0.13 per week when the subjected is being treated with thepharmaceutical composition over a period of between 52 and 78 weeks(e.g., 52 weeks, 65 weeks, or 78 weeks). In some embodiments, thetreatment is considered to be effective when the subject's ADAS-Cogscore increases at an average rate of no more than 0.125 per week whenthe subjected is being treated with the pharmaceutical composition overa period of between 52 and 78 weeks (e.g., 52 weeks, 65 weeks, or 78weeks). In some embodiments, the treatment is considered to be effectivewhen the subject's ADAS-Cog score increases at an average rate of nomore than 0.12 per week when the subjected is being treated with thepharmaceutical composition over a period of between 52 and 78 weeks(e.g., 52 weeks, 65 weeks, or 78 weeks). In some embodiments, thetreatment is considered to be effective when the subject's ADAS-Cogscore increases at an average rate of no more than 0.115 per week whenthe subjected is being treated with the pharmaceutical composition overa period of between 52 and 78 weeks (e.g., 52 weeks, 65 weeks, or 78weeks). In some embodiments, the treatment is considered to be effectivewhen the subject's ADAS-Cog score increases at an average rate of nomore than 0.11 per week when the subjected is being treated with thepharmaceutical composition over a period of between 52 and 78 weeks(e.g., 52 weeks, 65 weeks, or 78 weeks).

In some embodiments, the treatment is considered to be effective whenthe subject's ADAS-Cog score increases by less than about 1.0, less thanabout 2.0, less than about 3.0, less than 4.0, less than 5.0, or lessthan 6.0 after administration for 52 weeks as compared to the subject'sbaseline ADAS-Cog score. In some embodiments, the treatment isconsidered to be effective when the subject's ADAS-Cog score increasesin the range of about 0-6.0, 0-5.0, 0-4.0, 0-3.0, 0.5-6.0, 0.5-5.0,0.5-4.0, 0.5-3.0, 1.0-6.0, 1.0-5.0, 1.0-4.0, or 1.0-3.0 afteradministration for 52 weeks as compared to the subject's baselineADAS-Cog score.

In some embodiments, the treatment is considered to be effective whenthe subject's ADAS-Cog score increases by less than about 3.0, less thanabout 4.0, less than about 5.0, less than about 6.0, less than about7.0, or less than about 8.0 after administration for 65 weeks ascompared to the subject's baseline ADAS-Cog score. In some embodiments,the subject's ADAS-Cog score increases in the range of about 0-8.0,1.0-7.0, 2.0-6.0, or 3.0-6.0 after administration for 65 weeks ascompared to the subject's baseline ADAS-Cog score.

In some embodiments, the subject's ADAS-Cog score increases by less thanabout 5.0, less than about 6.0, less than about 7.0, less than about8.0, less than about 9.0, or less than about 10.0 after administrationfor 78 weeks as compared to the subject's baseline ADAS-Cog score. Insome embodiments, the subject's ADAS-Cog score increases in the range ofabout 0-10.0, 1.0-9.0, 2.0-9.0, 3.0-9.0, or 4.0-9.0 after administrationfor 78 weeks as compared to the subject's baseline ADAS-Cog score.

In some embodiments, a placebo can be used to determine treatmentefficacy. Specifically, the difference in ADAS-Cog score between a testpatient receiving the pharmaceutical composition and the averageADAS-Cog score determined in a group of patients receiving the placebo(the “placebo group”) can be used to determine treatment efficacy. Itshould be understood that the placebo group is a group wherein eachpatient received standard dosing and dosages of Aricept® alone (i.e.donepezil) or together with memantine. A patient having a statisticallysignificantly lower ADAS-Cog score than the placebo group means that thetreatment is effective. Similarly, a patient whose increase in ADAS-Cogscore after a period of treatment as compared to their baseline ADAS-Cogscore is statistically significantly less than the average increase inADAS-Cog score of the placebo group after the same time period, meansthat the treatment is effective.

In some embodiments, the treatment is considered to be effective whenthe change in the subject's baseline ADAS-Cog score is at least about2.5, at least about 3.0, at least about 3.5, at least about 3.75, atleast about 4.0, or at least about 4.25 less after administration for 52weeks as compared to the average change in baseline ADAS-Cog score inthe placebo group.

In some embodiments, the treatment is considered to be effective whenthe change in the subject's baseline ADAS-Cog score is at least about2.5, at least about 3.0, at least about 3.5, at least about 3.75, atleast about 4.0, or at least about 4.25 less after administration for 65weeks as compared to the average change in baseline ADAS-Cog score inthe placebo group.

In some embodiments, the treatment is considered to be effective whenthe change in the subject's baseline ADAS-Cog score is at least about2.5, at least about 3.0, at least about 3.5, at least about 3.75, atleast about 4.0, or at least about 4.25 less after administration for 78weeks as compared to the average change in baseline ADAS-Cog score inthe placebo group.

A CDR-SB score can also be used to quantify treatment efficacy. In someembodiments, the treatment is considered to be effective when thesubject's CDR-SB score increases at an average rate of no more than0.055 per week when the subject is being treated with the pharmaceuticalcomposition over a period of between 52 and 78 weeks (e.g., 52 weeks, 65weeks or 78 weeks). In some embodiments, the treatment is considered tobe effective when the subject's CDR-SB score increases at an averagerate of no more than 0.050 per week when the subject is being treatedwith the pharmaceutical composition over a period of between 52 and 78weeks (e.g., 52 weeks, 65 weeks or 78 weeks). In some embodiments, thetreatment is considered to be effective when the subject's CDR-SB scoreincreases at an average rate of no more than 0.045 per week when thesubject is being treated with the pharmaceutical composition over aperiod of between 52 and 78 weeks (e.g., 52 weeks, 65 weeks or 78weeks). In some embodiments, the treatment is considered to be effectivewhen the subject's CDR-SB score increases at an average rate of no morethan 0.040 per week when the subjected is being treated with thepharmaceutical composition over a period of between 52 and 78 weeks(e.g., 52 weeks, 65 weeks or 78 weeks).

In some embodiments, the subject's CDR-SB score increases no more than3.0, no more than 2.5 or no more than 2.1 over the baseline CDR-SB scoreafter administration for 52 weeks. In some embodiments, the subject'sCDR-SB score increases no more than 3.5, no more than 3.25 or no morethan 3.0 over the baseline CDR-SB score after administration for 65weeks. In some embodiments, the subject's CDR-SB score increases no morethan 4.5, no more than 4.0 or no more than 3.5 over the baseline CDR-SBscore after administration for 78 weeks.

In some embodiments, the treatment does not induce vasogenic edema.APOE4⁺ patients are at risk of vasogenic edema with amyloid antibodytreatments. By providing an alternative treatment to APOE4⁺ patients,the treatment disclosed herein can reduce the risk of vasogenic edema.

For the purposes of administration, in certain embodiments,tramiprosate, ALZ-801 or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof canbe administered as a raw chemical or formulated as pharmaceuticalcompositions. Pharmaceutical compositions useful in the presentdisclosure comprise tramiprosate, ALZ-801 or a pharmaceuticallyacceptable salt thereof, and one or more pharmaceutically acceptablecarriers. Tramiprosate, ALZ-801 or a pharmaceutically acceptable saltthereof is present in the composition in an effective amount to treatAD. In some specific embodiments, tramiprosate, ALZ-801 or apharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof is administered as apharmaceutical composition.

Pharmaceutic compositions comprising tramiprosate, ALZ-801 or apharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof can be administered orally.Pharmaceutical compositions comprising tramiprosate, ALZ-801 or apharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof can also be administered by anyother convenient route, for example, by intravenous infusion or bolusinjection, by absorption through epithelial or mucocutaneous linings(e.g., oral mucosa, rectal and intestinal mucosa, etc.) and can beadministered together with another biologically active agent.Administration can be systemic or local. Various delivery systems areknown, e.g., encapsulation in liposomes, microparticles, microcapsules,capsules, etc., and can be used to administer a compound. In certainembodiments, more than one compound is administered to a subject.Methods of administration include but are not limited to intradermal,intramuscular (including depot), intraperitoneal, intravenous,subcutaneous (including depot), intranasal, epidural, oral, sublingual(including rapid dissolving tablet, gum or equivalent), intranasal,intracerebral, intravaginal, transdermal, rectally, Intrapulmonary(aerosol or equivalent, including by inhalation), or topically,particularly to the ears, nose, eyes, or skin.

In a particular embodiment, a composition comprising tramiprosate,ALZ-801 or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof is administeredorally in a loose-filled capsule and provides for an extended half-life.In one aspect of this embodiment, a composition comprising tramiprosate,ALZ-801 or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof supplied in theloose-filled capsule provides a half-life of about 10 to about 18 hours.

In another particular embodiment, a composition comprising tramiprosate,ALZ-801 or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof is administeredorally in an immediate release tablet formulation. In one aspect of thisembodiment, a composition comprising tramiprosate, ALZ-801 or apharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof supplied in the immediaterelease table provides a half-life of 12 to about 24 hours.

In certain embodiments, the dosage range for oral administration oftramiprosate, ALZ-801 or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof isgenerally about 0.001 mg to about 2000 mg of a compound per kg bodymass. In some embodiments, the oral dose is 0.01 mg to 100 mg per kgbody mass, 0.1 mg to 50 mg per kg body mass, 0.5 mg to 20 mg per kg bodymass, or 1 mg to 10 mg per kg body mass. In some embodiments, the oraldose is 5 mg of a compound per kg body mass.

In further embodiments, the dose is about 10 mg to about 1000 mg,including all ranges and subranges there between, e.g., about 10 mg toabout 900 mg, about 10 mg to about 500 mg, about 10 mg to about 300 mg,about 50 mg to about 300 mg, about 50 mg to about 250 mg, or about 100mg to about 300 mg. In still further embodiments, the compositioncomprises tramiprosate and the dose is 100 mg or 150 mg. In someembodiments, the composition comprises ALZ-801 and the dose is about 250mg. In some embodiments, the composition comprises ALZ-801 and the doseis about 265 mg. In some embodiments, the composition comprises ALZ-801and the dose is about 165 mg. In some embodiments, the compositioncomprises ALZ-801 and the dose is about 175 mg.

In still further embodiments, ALZ-801 is formulated as an immediaterelease oral formulation. In other aspects, the oral formulation is aloose-filled formulation. In particular aspects of these embodiments,the ALZ-801 is administered in a dose range of 200 mg to 300 mg. Forexample, the dosage may be 220 mg to 280 mg; 240 mg to 270 mg, 250 mg to270 mg, 250 mg to 280 mg, or 260 mg to 270 mg. In certain aspects, thedose is 265 mg.

A composition comprising tramiprosate, ALZ-801 or a pharmaceuticallyacceptable salt thereof may be administered once, twice, three, or fourtimes daily, using any suitable mode described above. In someembodiments, ALZ-801 is administered twice a day.

Also, in certain embodiments, administration or treatment with acomposition comprising tramiprosate, ALZ-801 or a pharmaceuticallyacceptable salt thereof may be continued for a number of weeks; forexample, commonly treatment would continue for at least 2 weeks, 4weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks, 20 weeks, 24 weeks, 28 weeks, 32weeks, 36 weeks, 40 weeks, 44 weeks, 48 weeks, 52 weeks, 56 weeks, 60weeks, 64 weeks, 68 weeks, 72 weeks, 76 weeks, 80 weeks, 84 weeks, 88weeks, 92 weeks, 96 weeks, 100 weeks, or 104 weeks. In yet furtherembodiments, administration or treatment with a composition comprisingtramiprosate, ALZ-801 or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof maybe continued for a number of months; for example, commonly treatmentwould continue for at least 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 8 months, 10months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months, 20 months, or 24 months. Instill further embodiments, administration or treatment with acomposition comprising tramiprosate, ALZ-801 or a pharmaceuticallyacceptable salt thereof may be continued indefinitely.

In certain embodiments, a composition comprising tramiprosate, ALZ-801or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof can be used in combinationtherapy with at least one other therapeutic agent. Tramiprosate, ALZ-801or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and the at least one othertherapeutic agent can act additively or, in certain embodiments,synergistically. In certain embodiments, a composition comprisingtramiprosate, ALZ-801 or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof canbe administered concurrently with the administration of anothertherapeutic agent. In certain embodiments, a composition comprisingtramiprosate, ALZ-801 or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof canbe administered prior or subsequent to administration of anothertherapeutic agent. The at least one other therapeutic agent can beeffective for treating the same or different disease, disorder, orcondition.

Methods of the present invention include administration of one or morecompounds or pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention andone or more other therapeutic agents provided that the combinedadministration does not inhibit the therapeutic efficacy of the one ormore compounds of the present invention and/or does not produce adversecombination effects.

In certain embodiments, compositions of the present invention can beadministered concurrently with the administration of another therapeuticagent, which can be part of the same pharmaceutical composition as, orin a different composition from, that containing the compounds of thepresent invention. In certain embodiments, compounds of the presentinvention can be administered prior or subsequent to administration ofanother therapeutic agent. In certain embodiments of combinationtherapy, the combination therapy comprises alternating betweenadministering a composition of the present invention and a compositioncomprising another therapeutic agent, e.g., to minimize adverse sideeffects associated with a particular drug. When a compound of thepresent invention is administered concurrently with another therapeuticagent that potentially can produce adverse side effects including, butnot limited to, toxicity, the therapeutic agent can advantageously beadministered at a dose that falls below the threshold at which theadverse side effect is elicited.

In certain embodiments, compounds or pharmaceutical compositions of thepresent invention include, or can be administered to a patient togetherwith, another therapeutic drug that may be available over-the-counter orby prescription. U.S. patent application No. 2005/0031651 (incorporatedherein by reference) provide a long but non-exhaustive list of“therapeutic drugs” that can be useful, in combination, according to theinvention. Preferred therapeutic drugs to be used with the compounds orpharmaceutical compositions of the present invention are therapeuticdrugs useful in the prevention or treatment of AD or its symptoms,including but not limited to donepezil (Aricept®), memantine (Namenda™),rivastigmine (Exelon™) Galanthamine (Reminyl™ and R-flurbiprofen(Flurizan™). The compounds and compositions according to the inventioncould also be combined with vaccines and antibodies for the preventionor treatment of AD.

It should be noted that other tramiprosate compositions or variants oftramiprosate can be administered to target the identified patientpopulation disclosed herein. Exemplary tramiprosate compositions orvariants of tramiprosate are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,748,656, thecontents of which are incorporated herein by reference.

The contents of each cited application and journal article areincorporated by reference as if set forth fully herein.

EXAMPLES Example 1: APOE4⁺ Mild-to-Moderate Population vs. APOE4⁺Moderate Population

Phase 3 human clinical trials of tramiprosate to treat Alzheimer'sdisease at doses of 100 mg BID and 150 mg BID for up to 78 weeks wererun in both North America and Europe (1691 total patients enrolled).Placebos in both trials were treatment with donepezil either alone or incombination with memantine. ADAS-Cog scores and CDR-SB scores wereobtained every 13 weeks for patients that remained in the trial. Thepatients were genotyped for APOE4 and the severity of their disease wasmeasured using MMSE prior to the beginning of treatment. The data fromboth trials were merged for certain statistical analyses. Initialstatistical analyses of these data focused on APOE4 status and astatistically significant effect of both the 100 mg and 150 mg treatmentgroups compared with the placebo was observed for both ADAS-Cog andCDR-SB in the APOE4⁺ subgroup.

We then performed additional subgroup analysis, subgrouping by APOE4genotype/allele status (APOE4 heterozygous or APOE4 homozygous) and bydisease severity (mild vs moderate) to determine if the number of εalleles and/or the severity of disease predicted a better outcome oftramiprosate therapy. We found that there was a better therapy outcome,as measured by a smaller increase ADAS-Cog scores and CDR-SB scores(e.g., a slower cognitive decline) in all ApoE4⁺ patients who werecharacterized as having moderate severity of disease just prior totreatment.

TABLE 1 ADAS-Cog Score Change over Standard of Care for All APOE4⁺Patients ≤85 Years Treated with Tramiprosate and Subgrouped by DiseaseSeverity 52 weeks 65 weeks Disease (Δ improvement vs control)* (Δimprovement vs control) Severity 100 mg BID 150 mg BID Control 100 mgBID 150 mg BID Mild-to- 1.67 (n = 257) 0.95 (n = 242) (n = 298) 1.82 (n= 219) 1.23 (n = 209) Moderate (MMSE 16-26) Mild 0.82 (n = 171) 0.17 (n= 164) (n = 204) 0.99 (n = 150) 0.71 (n = 139) (MMSE 20-26) Moderate3.45 (n = 86) 2.52 (n = 78) (n = 94)  3.45 (n = 69) 2.23 (n = 70) (MMSE16-19) 65 weeks 78 weeks Disease (Δ improvement vs control) (Δimprovement vs control) Severity Control 100 mg BID 150 mg BID ControlMild-to- (n = 252) 2.03 (n = 206) 0.77 (n = 195) (n = 228) Moderate(MMSE 16-26) Mild (n = 177) 1.3 (n = 140) 0.27 (n = 131) (n = 160) (MMSE20-26) Moderate (n = 75)  3.32 (n = 66) 1.57 (n = 64) (n = 68)  (MMSE16-19) In Table 1, *control treatment is donepezil either alone or incombination with memantine. Positive delta values quantitate the amountby which average increase in ADAS-Cog Score points above baseline forthe control group exceeded the average increase in ADAS-Cog Score pointsabove baseline for the treatment group. Negative delta values indicatethat the treatment group had a greater increase in ADAS-Cog Score overbaseline than did the control group.

The results demonstrate that the APOE4⁺ group with moderately severe AD(MMSE 16-19) showed a greater inhibition of cognitive decline asmeasured by ADAS-Cog than either the mildly severe AD group (MMSE 20-26)or the combined moderately and mildly severe group (“Mild-to-Moderate”;MMSE 16-26). The change in baseline ADAS-Cog score by administered dosefor all APOE4⁺ patients without subgrouping by disease severity (i.e.,the Mild-to-Moderate group) is shown in FIG. 3. The change in baselineADAS-Cog score by administered dose for APOE4⁺ patients having moderatedisease severity is shown in FIG. 5.

TABLE 2 CDR-SB Score Change over Standard of Care for All APOE4⁺Patients ≤85 Years Treated with Tramiprosate and Subgrouped by DiseaseSeverity 52 weeks 65 weeks Disease (Δ improvement vs control)* (Δimprovement vs control) Severity 100 mg BID 150 mg BID Control 100 mgBID 150 mg BID Mild-to- 0.26 (n = 254) 0.44 (n = 243) (n = 302) 0.5 (n =215) 0.5 (n = 208) Moderate (MMSE 16-26) Mild 0.14 (n = 170) 0.16 (n =163) (n = 206) 0.34 (n = 147) 0.2 (n = 138) (MMSE 20-26) Moderate 0.56(n = 84) 1.00 (n = 80) (n = 96)  0.83 (n = 68) 1.12 (n = 70) (MMSE16-19) 65 weeks 78 weeks Disease (Δ improvement vs control) (Δimprovement vs control) Severity Control 100 mg BID 150 mg BID ControlMild-to- (n = 252) 0.55 (n = 204) 0.6 (n = 196) (n = 230) Moderate (MMSE16-26) Mild (n = 176) 0.35 (n = 139) 0.18 (n = 130) (n = 160) (MMSE20-26) Moderate (n = 76)  0.98 (n = 65) 1.53 (n = 66) (n = 70)  (MMSE16-19) In Table 2, *control treatment is donepezil either alone or incombination with memantine. Positive delta values quantitate the amountby which average increase in CDR-SB Score points above baseline for thecontrol group exceeded the average increase in CDR-SB Score points abovebaseline for the treatment group. Negative delta values indicate thatthe treatment group had a greater increase in CDR-SB Score over baselinethan did the control group.

The results again demonstrate that the APOE4⁺ group with moderatelysevere AD (MMSE 16-19) showed a greater inhibition of cognitive declineas measured by CDR-SB than either the mildly severe AD group (MMSE20-26) or the combined moderately and mildly severe group(“Mild-to-Moderate”′ MMSE 16-26)). The change in baseline CDR-SB scoreby administered dose for all APOE4⁺ patients without subgrouping bydisease severity (i.e., the Mild-to-Moderate group) is shown in FIG. 4.The change in baseline CDR-SB score by administered dose for APOE4⁺patients having moderate disease severity is shown in FIG. 6.

TABLE 3 ADAS-Cog Score Change over Standard of Care for HeterozygousAPOE4⁺ Patients ≤85 Years Treated with Tramiprosate and Subgrouped byDisease Severity 52 weeks 65 weeks Disease (Δ improvement vs control)*(Δ improvement vs control) Severity 100 mg BID 150 mg BID Control 100 mgBID 150 mg BID Mild-to- 2.0 (n = 210) 0.5 (n = 201) (n = 233) 0.8 (n =187) 0.0 (n = 174) Moderate (MMSE 16-26) Mild 0.9 (n = 144) 0.1 (n =130) (n = 158) −0.3 (n = 128) −0.6 (n = 114) (MMSE 20-26) Moderate 4.4(n = 66) 1.5 (n = 71) (n = 75)  3.4 (n = 59) 1.4 (n = 60) (MMSE 16-19)65 weeks 78 weeks Disease (Δ improvement vs control) (Δ improvement vscontrol) Severity Control 100 mg BID 150 mg BID Control Mild-to- (n =212) 1.1 (n = 163) −0.4 (n = 157) (n = 178) Moderate (MMSE 16-26) Mild(n = 146) 0.8 (n = 114) −0.5 (n = 102) (n = 127) (MMSE 20-26) Moderate(n = 66)  2 (n = 49) 0 (n = 55) (n = 51)  (MMSE 16-19) In Table 3,*control treatment is donepezil either alone or in combination withmemantine. Positive delta values quantitate the amount by which averageincrease in ADAS-Cog Score points above baseline for the control groupexceeded the average increase in ADAS-Cog Score points above baselinefor the treatment group. Negative delta values indicate that thetreatment group had a greater increase in ADAS-Cog Score over baselinethan did the control group.

The results demonstrate that the APOE4 heterozygous group withmoderately severe AD (MMSE 16-19) showed a greater inhibition ofcognitive decline as measured by ADAS-Cog than either the mildly severeAD group (MMSE 20-26) or the combined moderately and mildly severe group(“Mild-to-Moderate”; MMSE 16-26). The change in baseline ADAS-Cog scoreby administered dose for APOE4 heterozygous patients without subgroupingby disease severity (i.e., the Mild-to-Moderate group) is shown in FIG.1.

TABLE 4 CDR-SB Score Change over Standard of Care for HeterozygousAPOE4⁺ Patients ≤85 Years Treated with Tramiprosate and Subgrouped byDisease Severity 52 weeks 65 weeks Disease (Δ improvement vs control)*(Δ improvement vs control) Severity 100 mg BID 150 mg BID Control 100 mgBID 150 mg BID Mild-to- 0.5 (n = 208) 0.4 (n = 204) (n = 243) 0.5 (n =184) 0.3 (n = 174) Moderate (MMSE 16-26) Mild 0.2 (n = 143) 0.1 (n =130) (n = 160) 0.3 (n = 125) −0.1 (n = 114) (MMSE 20-26) Moderate 1.00(n = 65) 1.00 (n = 74) (n = 83)  1.00 (n = 59) 1.1 (n = 60) (MMSE 16-19)65 weeks 78 weeks Disease (Δ improvement vs control) (Δ improvement vscontrol) Severity Control 100 mg BID 150 mg BID Control Mild-to- (n =217) 0.6 (n = 161) 0.50 (n = 161) (n = 187) Moderate (MMSE 16-26) Mild(n = 146) 0.3 (n = 112) 0 (n = 103) (n = 127) (MMSE 20-26) Moderate (n =71)  1.00 (n = 49) 1.5 (n = 58) (n = 60)  (MMSE 16-19) In Table 4,*control treatment is donepezil either alone or in combination withmemantine. Positive delta values quantitate the amount by which averageincrease in CDR-SB Score points above baseline for the control groupexceeded the average increase in CDR-SB Score points above baseline forthe treatment group. Negative delta values indicate that the treatmentgroup had a greater increase in CDR-SB Score over baseline than did thecontrol group.

The results demonstrate that the APOE4 heterozygous group withmoderately severe AD (MMSE 16-19) showed a greater inhibition ofcognitive decline as measured by CDR-SB than either the mildly severe ADgroup (MMSE 20-26) or the combined moderately and mildly severe group(“Mild-to-Moderate”; MMSE 16-26). The change in baseline CDR-SB score byadministered dose for APOE4 heterozygous patients without subgrouping bydisease severity (i.e., the Mild-to-Moderate group) is shown in FIG. 2.

Subgrouping of patients homozygous for APOE4 by disease severity was notpossible due to the small number of APOE4/4 homozygous patients in thetrials. Despite this, the results for all APOE4⁺ patients (all carriers)and APOE4 heterozygotes suggested that the superior results obtainedwith patients having moderately severe AD over those with mildly severeAD can be extrapolated to APOE4/4 homozygotes as well. However, furtheranalysis of the data from the tramiprosate Phase 3 clinical trialsurprisingly showed that APOE4/4 homozygotes actually responded betterif they had a more mild form of the disease as shown below in Example 2.

Example 2: APOE4/4 Homozygous Subjects with More Mild AD DemonstrateBetter Cognitive Response to Tramiprosate

Analysis of the efficacy or tramiprosate in APOE4/4 homozygous subjectsbased on baseline MMSE was performed to evaluate for differences in drugresponse between Mild and Moderate patients. MMRM analyses wereperformed on the following baseline MMSE categories: Mild-to-Moderate ADpopulation (baseline MMSE 16-26 inclusive), Mild AD population (baselineMMSE 20-26 inclusive), and the More Mild AD population (baseline MMSE22-26 inclusive). The data is shown below in FIG. 7, panels A and B.

These analyses suggest that APOE4/4 homozygous patients with Mild AD(baseline MMSE ≥20) or More Mild AD (baseline MMSE ≥22) show a higherimprovement on tramiprosate at 150 mg BID than those with lower MMSE atbaseline. Additionally, patients with baseline MMSE ≥22 (More Mildpatients) seem to show the highest efficacy and a sustained cognitivebenefit over the 78 weeks of the study. Although there were not enoughsubjects to analyze certain other ranges of baseline MMSE in APOE4/4homozygous patients, the trend suggests that APOE4⁺ homozygous patientswith mild-moderate AD (baseline MMSE=1819) may also show a higherimprovement than APOE4⁺ homozygous patients with more moderate AD(baseline MMSE=16-17).

Example 3: ALZ-801

To advance the clinical development of ALZ-801 into Phase 3, we havecompleted single dose and 14-day multiple ascending dose Phase 1bridging studies in healthy elderly volunteers to evaluate safety,tolerability and pharmacokinetics. Compared with oral tramiprosate, asingle dose of oral ALZ-801 delivered an equivalent plasma exposure oftramiprosate with over 50% lower inter-subject variability (see Table 5,below). Oral ALZ-801 also prolonged plasma tramiprosate terminalhalf-life to −24 hours once steady state was achieved (see Table 6,below). The longer half-life observed in the multiple ascending dosestudies was obtained after 14 days of BID dosing and was due to the factthat there were more extended blood sampling time points taken in thatstudy as compared to the single dose study. In a multiple ascending dosestudy, steady state for ALZ-801 was achieved by day 7 of BID dosing andinterpatient variability of both C_(max) and AUC was between 24-28% atsteady state.

TABLE 5 Phase I Single dose studies of ALZ- 801 demonstrate improved PKprofile ALZ-801 loose-filled Tramiprosate modified Tramiprosate capsule(N = 12) release tablet (N = 12) Cmax (ng/ml)  628 ± 100 506 ± 187AUC_(0-t) (h × ng/mL) 2,680 ± 448 2,355 ± 747  T_(1/2) (h)  14.9 ± 3.94.9 ± 2.6

TABLE 6 Multiple Ascending Dose Phase I studies of ALZ-801 confirmimproved PK profile ALZ-801 loose-filled Tramiprosate modifiedTramiprosate capsule (N = 12) release tablet (N = 12) Cmax (ng/ml) 673 ±127 [19%]  506 ± 187 [37%] AUC_(0-t) (h × ng/mL) 2,440 ± 448 [17%] 2,355 ± 747 [32%] T_(1/2) (h)  24.5 ± 3.4 [15%]¹   4.9 ± 2.6 [53%]¹Half-life was measured at 14 days based on a dose of 256.5 mg BID.

An immediate release tablet formulation of ALZ-801 was developed, whichdisplayed exposure and low variability similar to the loose filledcapsule formulation. Administration of ALZ-801 in such tablet form withfood markedly reduced the incidence of GI symptoms as ¹Half-life wasmeasured at 14 days based on a dose of 256.5 mg BID.

1. A method of treating Alzheimer's Disease in a subject, the methodcomprising administering a pharmaceutical composition comprisingvalyl-3-amino-1-propanesulfonic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptablesalt thereof to a subject determined to (i) be APOE4 heterozygous andhave moderate Alzheimer's Disease; or (ii) be APOE4/4 homozygous andhave mild or mild-moderate Alzheimer's disease.
 2. A method of treatingAlzheimer's Disease in a subject, the method comprising the steps of: a.administering a pharmaceutical composition comprising tramiprosate,valyl-3-amino-1-propanesulfonic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptablesalt of either of the foregoing to a subject determined to (i) be APOE4heterozygous and have moderate Alzheimer's Disease; or (ii) be APOE4/4homozygous and have mild or mild-moderate Alzheimer's disease; and b.not administering, to the subject, the pharmaceutical composition whenthe subject is determined to be (i) APOE4 negative; (ii) APOE4heterozygous and not suffering from moderate Alzheimer's Disease; or(iii) APOE4/4 homozygous and not suffering from mild or mild-moderateAlzheimer's disease.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the severity ofthe Alzheimer's disease in the subject was determined by a score in aMini-mental State Examination (MMSE) taken within sixty days prior tothe first administration of the composition and wherein: a. the subjectwas determined to have moderate Alzheimer's Disease when the subject hada Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) score in the range of 16-19; b.the subject was determined to have mild Alzheimer's Disease when thesubject had a Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) score in the range of20-26; and c. the subject was determined to have mild-moderateAlzheimer's Disease when the subject had a Mini-mental State Examination(MMSE) score in the range of 18-19.
 4. The method of claim 3, whereinthe subject is APOE4 heterozygous and has moderate Alzheimer's diseaseas indicated by a baseline MMSE score of 16-19.
 5. The method of claim3, wherein the subject is APOE4/4 homozygous and has mild-moderate ormild Alzheimer's disease as indicated by a baseline MMSE score of 18-26.6. The method of claim 3, wherein the subject is APOE4/4 homozygous andhas mild Alzheimer's disease as indicated by a baseline MMSE score of20-26.
 7. The method of claim 3, wherein the subject is APOE4⁺homozygous and has more mild Alzheimer's disease as indicated by abaseline MMSE score of 22-26.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein thepharmaceutical composition delivers a dose of tramiprosate in a range of100 mg-150 mg/dose.
 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the pharmaceuticalcomposition comprises between 260 and 270 mg ofvalyl-3-amino-1-propanesulfonic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptablesalt thereof.
 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the compositioncomprises 265 mg of valyl-3-amino-1-propanesulfonic acid, and whereinthe composition is formulated as an instant release, oral tablet orcapsule.
 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the pharmaceuticalcomposition is administered twice daily.
 12. The method of claim 1,wherein the subject is 85 years old or younger.
 13. The method of claim1, wherein the treatment decreases cognitive decline in the subject. 14.A method of determining a subject's suitability for treatment withvalyl-3-amino-1-propanesulfonic acid, comprising determining the APOE4status of the subject and the severity of the subject's Alzheimer'sdisease, wherein if: a) the subject is APOE4 heterozygous and hasmoderate Alzheimer's disease; orb) the subject is APOE4/4 homozygous andhas mild or mild-moderate Alzheimer's disease, the subject is determinedto be suitable for treatment.
 15. A pharmaceutical compositioncomprising between 260 mg and 270 mg of valyl-3-amino-1-propanesulfonicacid; and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, wherein the compositionis formulated as an instant release, oral tablet or capsule.
 16. Amethod of treating Alzheimer's disease comprising administering to asubject in need thereof, the pharmaceutical composition of claim
 15. 17.The method of claim 16, wherein the pharmaceutical composition isadministered twice day.